An animated whiteboard systematically debunking Greenpeace’s extreme rhetoric.

Open Invitation Clock
Loading Clock
Total time that Greenpeace
has ignored open invitation
from International Seafood
Sustainability Foundation
(ISSF) to participate in the
ongoing dialogue about Tuna
fisheries & sustainability.
Tuesday, September 20th, 2011

In the past seven days, Greenpeace has bombarded its followers with e-mails “urgently” demanding that they rush their most generous contributions and this morning was no different.

For the third time since last Tuesday, Greenpeace claimed that it needed $60,000 to make yet another 48-hour deadline so they could continue harassing tuna companies. Interesting, so either Greenpeace has repeatedly missed its 48 hour deadline… or its total donation request in the last week stands at a whopping $180,000. Nearly 200 grand in just ONE week? Really? That could be the yearly income of three families. Or the tuition for almost 24 students to go to a public university. Or a year’s rent for 20 households. Or 1.4 million meals for the hungry.

So which is it? With so many struggling to get by, does Greenpeace really expect its supporters to fund its latest yacht excursions? Or is its continued begging actually evidence that Greenpeace is struggling to make its phony, self-imposed deadlines usually reserved for unscrupulous televangelists?

Posted by TFT-Staff

 
Greenpeace Cycle of
Abuse: Case History



Greenpeace Hypocrisy:
Case in Point